From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobb v. Yelich

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 26, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-26

In the Matter of Kenneth COBB, Petitioner, v. Bruce YELICH, as Superintendent of Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Kenneth Cobb, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



Kenneth Cobb, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, McCARTHY, GARRY and CLARK, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of THC. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis results, related documentation and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence supporting the determination ( see Matter of Cagle v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 913, 913, 968 N.Y.S.2d 415 [2013];Matter of Sutton v. Prack, 107 A.D.3d 1250, 1250, 967 N.Y.S.2d 508 [2013] ). Further, the request for urinalysis form and the testimony of the correction officers involved established that petitioner's urine sample was properly secured and that there was an unbroken chain of custody over the urine sample ( see Matter of Polite v. Goord, 22 A.D.3d 1000, 1001, 802 N.Y.S.2d 387 [2005];Matter of Yaacef Saif'Ul'Bait v. Goord, 15 A.D.3d 703, 704–705, 788 N.Y.S.2d 712 [2005] ). We reject petitioner's contention that he was improperly denied the testimony of certain witnesses, as such testimony would have been redundant ( see Matter of Cody v. Fischer, 84 A.D.3d 1651, 1651–1652, 923 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2011];Matter of Warren v. Fischer, 63 A.D.3d 1466, 1467, 884 N.Y.S.2d 779 [2009] ). Petitioner's remaining claims, including his assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased against him, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Cobb v. Yelich

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 26, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Cobb v. Yelich

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Kenneth COBB, Petitioner, v. Bruce YELICH, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 26, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 1235
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4825

Citing Cases

Williams v. Prack

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, together with…

Watson v. Gardner

Turning to petitioner's procedural contentions, we are unpersuaded that he was improperly denied the right to…