From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coastal States Mortg. v. Com. S L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 12, 1986
497 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-1952.

November 12, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Murray Goldman, J.

Robbins Reynolds and Marc J. Reynolds, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Stroock Stroock Lavan and David C. Pollack and Barry J. Warsch, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


It appears that, had it not been for the excusable neglect of appellant's counsel, appellant would have timely filed in opposition to the appellee's motion for summary judgment more than ample evidence to indisputably raise a genuine issue of fact as to whether the appellee, as it alleged, had fully performed its agreement with appellant. Therefore, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for rehearing and to vacate the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee, such motion having been made immediately upon the discovery of counsel's mistake and on the day following the summary judgment hearing and entry of judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Coastal States Mortg. v. Com. S L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 12, 1986
497 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Coastal States Mortg. v. Com. S L

Case Details

Full title:COASTAL STATES MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. COMMONWEALTH SAVINGS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 12, 1986

Citations

497 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Olesh v. Greenberg

Therefore, in light of the unique circumstances presented here, we determine that the trial court abused its…

Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

In this case, the totally unexplained failure of the defendants-mortgagors' retained lawyer, who had been…