From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coast to Coast Energy, v. Gasarch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3495, 3495A.

October 28, 2010.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), entered May 5, 2010, which, inter alia, denied defendants' motions to suppress certain documents and information allegedly wrongfully obtained by plaintiffs, to disqualify plaintiffs' counsel, and for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Michael C. Taglieri of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David C. Bornstein of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


We find that the record does not support findings that plaintiffs obtained the subject materials through theft, eavesdropping, or other unlawful means. We also find that the record does not support findings that the subject materials were improperly or irregularly obtained within the meaning of CPLR 3103 (c), but, even if the record did support such findings, we would affirm. No basis exists to disturb the Special Referee's findings that all of the subject materials in any event would have to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery, and, accordingly, that no substantial right of defendants' could have been prejudiced by the manner in which they were obtained (CPLR 3103 [c]; see Robinson v Robinson, 308 AD2d 332, 333; Levy v Grandone, 8 AD3d 630). In view of the foregoing, the court also properly denied defendants' motion for a protective order and to disqualify plaintiffs' counsel. We have considered defendants' other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Coast to Coast Energy, v. Gasarch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Coast to Coast Energy, v. Gasarch

Case Details

Full title:COAST TO COAST ENERGY, INC., et al., Respondents, v. MARK GASARCH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7681
909 N.Y.S.2d 360

Citing Cases

Fuchs v. Volz

One crucial consideration in determining whether a substantial right of a party has been prejudiced is…

Rubin v. Sabharwal

Suppression is not warranted even of documents that had been "improperly or irregularly obtained within the…