Opinion
23-15087
07-08-2024
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS; TORO CASTANO; SARAH CRONK; JOSHUA DONOHOE; MOLIQUE FRANK; DAVID MARTINEZ; TERESA SANDOVAL; NATHANIEL VAUGHN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF HOMELESSNESS AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING; SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT; SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; LONDON BREED, in her Official Capacity as Mayor; SAM DODGE, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Healthy Streets Operation Center (HSOC), Defendants-Appellants.
D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05502-DMR
SUMMARY [*]
Homelessness
The panel (1) withdrew its opinions filed on January 11, 2024, reported at 90 F.4th 975 (9th Cir. 2024), and 2024 WL 125340 (9th Cir. Jan. 11, 2024), in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, No. 23175 (U.S. June 28, 2024), which held that the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment; and (2) filed a memorandum disposition replacing both withdrawn decisions.
Before: Patrick J. Bumatay, Lucy H. Koh, and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinions filed on January 11, 2024 (Dkt Nos. 89, 90), reported at Coalition on Homelessness v. City and County of San Francisco, 90 F.4th 975 (9th Cir. 2024), and 2024 WL 125340 (9th Cir. Jan. 11, 2024), are withdrawn in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, No. 23-175 (U.S. June 28, 2024). A concurrently filed memorandum disposition replaces both withdrawn decisions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[*] This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.