From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coake v. Burt

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Dec 19, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-188246 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-188246 Opinion No. 2012-MO-056

12-19-2012

Robert Coake and Susan Coake, Respondents, v. Kathleen Burt, n/k/a Kathleen Thomason, Petitioner.

Harold P. Threlkeld, of Anderson, for Petitioner. James Allbright Blair III and Kirsten Elena Small, both of Nexsen Pruet, of Greenville, for Respondents.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2),

SCACR.


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS


Appeal From Anderson County

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY

GRANTED


Harold P. Threlkeld, of Anderson, for Petitioner.
James Allbright Blair III and Kirsten Elena Small, both of Nexsen Pruet, of Greenville, for Respondents.

PER CURIUM : We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals finding the circuit court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the seller of residential real estate because the issues of the reasonableness of the purchasers' inspection of the real estate prior to closing and the damages incurred from the seller's alleged incomplete or misleading disclosures on the inspection form were questions that should have been resolved by the jury. See Coake v. Burt, 391 S.C. 201, 705 S.E.2d 453 (Ct. App. 2010). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coake v. Burt

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Dec 19, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-188246 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Coake v. Burt

Case Details

Full title:Robert Coake and Susan Coake, Respondents, v. Kathleen Burt, n/k/a…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-188246 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)