Opinion
526502
12-06-2018
Raymond Clyde, Malone, petitioner pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Raymond Clyde, Malone, petitioner pro se.
Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
A female correctional facility employee observed petitioner exposing himself and masturbating in his cell. As a result, he was charged with engaging in lewd conduct and interfering with an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. Upon administrative appeal, the determination was modified by dismissing the charge of interfering with an employee but otherwise affirmed. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, video and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bradshaw v. Annucci, 163 A.D.3d 1380, 1381, 80 N.Y.S.3d 748 [2018] ; Matter of Cowart v. Burnett, 159 A.D.3d 1253, 1253, 70 N.Y.S.3d 401 [2018] ). According to the report and the employee's testimony, the employee spoke to petitioner in his cell on the day in question and petitioner was fully clothed at that time. After speaking with petitioner, the employee stopped a little further down the cellblock and spoke to another inmate for a few minutes. As she was leaving the cellblock, the employee walked past petitioner's cell and observed that he was naked and masturbating. Although petitioner testified that he was unaware that the employee was still on the cellblock when he masturbated, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Rivera v. McGinnis, 290 A.D.2d 800, 800–801, 735 N.Y.S.2d 899 [2002], lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 601, 744 N.Y.S.2d 761, 771 N.E.2d 834 [2002] ; Matter of McMillian v. Selsky, 268 A.D.2d 936, 936, 702 N.Y.S.2d 679 [2000] ). We reject petitioner's contention that he was improperly removed from the hearing, as the record reflects that he failed to comply with respondent's repeated warnings to stop being disruptive by trying to get out of his chair or he would be removed (see Matter of Alsaifullah v. Fischer, 118 A.D.3d 1239, 1240, 987 N.Y.S.2d 717 [2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 906, 2014 WL 5368870 [2014] ; Matter of Blocker v. Fischer, 107 A.D.3d 1285, 1286, 967 N.Y.S.2d 525 [2013] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including that respondent was biased, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.