Opinion
July, 1893.
Samuel Fleischman, for plaintiff (respondent).
A. Moot, for defendant (appellant).
I am for an affirmance of the judgment appealed from solely on the authority of the case of Hawthorne v. Calef, 2 Wall. 10, which seems to hold that, notwithstanding the reservation by the legislature of the right to amend charters of corporations, the act of 1892 is unconstitutional as to the plaintiff in this action.
Judgment affirmed.