From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cloke v. Yeggy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-677 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-677

03-27-2013

ALFRED K. CLOKE, III, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY YEGGY, et al. Defendants.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz


DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE ORDER AND REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 63); (2) DENYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 58);

(3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Docs. 37, 46);

(4) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO PROCEED TO TRIAL AS MOOT

(Docs. 42, 51); AND (5) CERTIFYING THAT AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE

TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND DENYING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO APPEAL IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

This case is before the Court on the Order and Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (Doc. 63). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 70). Although Plaintiff objects to certain portions of the Order and Report and Recommendations, he also agrees with many of the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge de novo, as well the motions, memoranda, and objections filed by the parties. Upon considering all issues de novo, the Court finds no merit to Plaintiff's Objections. Accordingly, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Order and Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety; (2) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 58); (3) GRANTS Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 37, 46); (4) DENIES Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed to Trial (Docs. 42, 51) as moot; and (5) CERTIFIES that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall TERMINATE this case on the docket of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cloke v. Yeggy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-677 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Cloke v. Yeggy

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED K. CLOKE, III, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY YEGGY, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-677 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Gould v. United Bhd. of Carpenters

See, e.g., United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Dresden Loc. No. 267 v. United Bhd. of Carpenters &…