From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemons v. Glicksman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 2006
25 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7637N.

January 19, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered April 25, 2005, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff's motion to renew an earlier order of the same court and Justice, entered November 8, 2004, and to preclude the deposition of Dr. Rudelli, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Shearer Essner, LLP, New York (David M. Shearer of counsel), for appellant.

Kaufman Borgeest Ryan LLP, Valhalla (Jacqueline Mandell of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ., concur.


While "new facts" existed to support a motion for renewal, viz., Dr. Rudelli's alleged retention as an expert by plaintiff, this retention would not "change the prior determination" (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]) since an expert may always be deposed "upon a showing of special circumstances" (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Clemons v. Glicksman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 2006
25 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Clemons v. Glicksman

Case Details

Full title:LARRY CLEMONS, as Administrator of the Estate of JENNIFER CLEMONS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 19, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 325
808 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Wolfus v. Bd. of Managers of Cent. Park Place

Even where a moving party is able to demonstrate new facts, the motion must be denied where these new facts…

Slonim v. Altman Stage Lighting Co. (In re N.Y.C. Asbestos Litig.)

"Renewal is granted sparingly and only in cases where there is a valid excuse for failing to submit…