From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleghorn v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 28, 1929
121 So. 436 (Ala. 1929)

Opinion

3 Div. 884.

March 28, 1929.

E. T. Graham and C. H. Roquemore, both of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Allie F. Cleghorn was convicted of vagrancy and appealed to the Court of Appeals. The judgment of conviction being there affirmed, defendant now applies for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review its said judgment and decision in the case styled Cleghorn v. State, 121 So. 435.


The petitioner seeks to review the Court of Appeals on questions of fact, and an application of the doctrine of error without injury, as applied to the facts.

On the authority of Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912, the writ must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cleghorn v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 28, 1929
121 So. 436 (Ala. 1929)
Case details for

Cleghorn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Allie F. CLEGHORN v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 28, 1929

Citations

121 So. 436 (Ala. 1929)
219 Ala. 155

Citing Cases

Cleghorn v. State

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Cleghorn v. State, 219 Ala. 155, 121 So. 436. Charge 2,…

City of Birmingham v. Lynch

The argument also overlooks or ignores the fact that the Court of Appeals, in like position as was this court…