From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Rader

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0308-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0308-JJB-CN

02-17-2012

PAUL T. CLARKE (#337576) v. STEVE RADER


RULING ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Having separately issued a final Order in connection with the above-captioned proceeding, in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court or the final order in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and having considered the record in the case and the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court hereby finds that:

_ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right on the issues(s) stated below having been made, the petitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED.

ISSUE(S)

X a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right having not been made, the petitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report.

____________

JAMES J. BRADY

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clarke v. Rader

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0308-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Clarke v. Rader

Case Details

Full title:PAUL T. CLARKE (#337576) v. STEVE RADER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 17, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0308-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)

Citing Cases

Staden v. Poret

Courts in the Middle District of Louisiana have uniformly held that a writ application filed without the…