From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. MVAIC

Supreme Court of New York
Jul 23, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50729 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

Opinion

2020-261 K C

07-23-2021

Colin Clarke, M.D., P.C., as Assignee of Ariel Burgos, Abner Hidalgo, Yolanda Jemison, Sheldon Lewis, Joshua Martinez and Roza Yefremenko, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.

Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Frank D'Esposito and Jeffrey Kadushin of counsel), for appellant. Petre and Associates, P.C. (Damin J. Toell and Mark Petre of counsel), for respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Frank D'Esposito and Jeffrey Kadushin of counsel), for appellant.

Petre and Associates, P.C. (Damin J. Toell and Mark Petre of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT:: WAVNY TOUSSAINT, J.P., MICHELLE WESTON, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sandra E. Roper, J.), entered May 15, 2019. The order denied defendant's motion to sever the claim of each assignor into separate actions.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion to sever the claim of each assignor into separate actions is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered May 15, 2019 denying defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 603 to sever the claim of each assignor into separate actions.

The complaint alleges that the claims arose out of six separate accidents which occurred on six different dates. A review of the denial of claim forms, explanations of review and correspondence pertaining to the claims at issue reflects that the facts relating to each claim are likely to raise few, if any, common issues of fact (see Mount Sinai Hosp. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 291 A.D.2d 536 [2002]; Radiology Resource Network, P.C. v Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 12 A.D.3d 185 [2004]). Indeed, under the facts of this case, an extraordinary number of defense witnesses would be required at a single trial of all six claims. As a result, defendant's motion to sever the causes of action should have been granted (see Mount Sinai Hosp. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 291 A.D.2d 536; Maria Oca, M.D., P.C. v MVAIC, 35 Misc.3d 134 [A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50758[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2012]).

Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion to sever the claim of each assignor into separate actions is granted.

TOUSSAINT, J.P., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clarke v. MVAIC

Supreme Court of New York
Jul 23, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50729 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)
Case details for

Clarke v. MVAIC

Case Details

Full title:Colin Clarke, M.D., P.C., as Assignee of Ariel Burgos, Abner Hidalgo…

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50729 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

Citing Cases

Regal Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC

The complaint alleges that the claims of the seven assignors arose out of five separate accidents which…