Argued February 20, 1911
Decided March 14, 1911
William H. Oppenheimer and H.V. Rutherford for appellant.
William B. Hale for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, without passing upon the question whether the contract was entire or severable; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Absent: HAIGHT, J.
Full title:WILLIAM L. CLARK, Respondent, v . JOHN B. WEST, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 14, 1911
ovided that plaintiffs and defendant were to divide the "net profit" equally; "net profit" was defined as the…
Strand Building Corp. v. Russell & Saxe, Inc.The substantive importance of the 500-share agreement in relationship to the entire contract, or whether it…