From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. U.S. Plywood

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 17, 1980
607 P.2d 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 76-6736, CA 10832

Argued and submitted August 25, 1978 Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court January 2, 1980

Remanded March 17, 1980

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Keith D. Skelton, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Benton Flaxel, North Bend, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Flaxel, Todd Nylander, North Bend.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Schwab, C.J., and Joseph, Judge.

Schwab, C.J., vice Lee, J., deceased.


JOSEPH, J.

Remanded.


Our previous decision in this Workers' Compensation case, 38 Or. App. 381, 590 P.2d 281 (1979), was reversed and remanded to this court by the Supreme Court. 288 Or. 255, 605 P.2d 265 (1980). In that decision the Supreme Court said:

"We believe that the compensability of on-premises injuries sustained while engaged in activities for the personal comfort of the employee can best be determined by a test which asks: Was the conduct expressly or impliedly allowed by the employer?" 288 Or at 266.

The court pointed out that neither the Board nor this court "considered the facts of this case in the light of the rule we have adopted in this opinion." 288 Or at 267. We therefore remand to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

Remanded.


Summaries of

Clark v. U.S. Plywood

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 17, 1980
607 P.2d 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Clark v. U.S. Plywood

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of GEORGE CLARK…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 17, 1980

Citations

607 P.2d 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
607 P.2d 1215

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Peter Kiewit Sons

Much has been said about how it is determined whether certain activity of an employe arose "out of and in the…