From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Unitedhealth Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 23, 2018
CIV 13-0372 MV/CG (D.N.M. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CIV 13-0372 MV/CG

07-23-2018

KAREN CLARK, Plaintiff, v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen filed her Proposed Findings and Conclusions of Law on June 12, 2018 (Doc. 133) in which she recommended that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 97) be denied. The proposed findings notify the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. As of today, no objections have been filed, and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Conclusions of Law (Doc. 133) is ADOPTED; and

2. Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 97) is DENIED.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

MARTHA VAZQUEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Clark v. Unitedhealth Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 23, 2018
CIV 13-0372 MV/CG (D.N.M. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Clark v. Unitedhealth Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN CLARK, Plaintiff, v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

CIV 13-0372 MV/CG (D.N.M. Jul. 23, 2018)

Citing Cases

Fedor v. United Healthcare, Inc.

But as Defendants also recognize, in her Proposed Findings and Disposition in Clark, a third judge from this…