Clark v. State

Full title: MICHAEL ALLEN CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 10, 2019

275 So. 3d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-2472

07-10-2019

Michael Allen CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement in that it indicates Appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation, when the court found only a violation of condition three. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order accurately specifying the basis for the revocation. See Wilkerson v. State , 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

Ray, C.J., and Wetherell and Winokur, JJ., concur.