From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Summary

In Clark v. State of New York, 245 A.D.2d 413, 666 N.Y.S.2d 209, this Court stated that "[t]he claimant's decedent... was injured while playing basketball in a State park in Yorktown, New York. The trial court correctly concluded that the claimant's decedent did not assume the risk of an injury caused by a steep drop-off several inches from the edge of the playing area's asphalt surface since this created a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport" (id. at 413, 666 N.Y.S.2d 209 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary of this case from Philius v. City of N.Y.

Opinion

December 15, 1997

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The claimant's decedent Lionel Clark II was injured while playing basketball in a State park in Yorktown, New York. The trial court correctly concluded that the claimant's decedent did not assume the risk of an injury caused by a steep drop-off several inches from the edge of the playing area's asphalt surface since this "created a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport" ( Owen v. R.J.S. Safety Equip., 79 N.Y.2d 967, 970; see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 485). Accordingly, the claimant's decedent cannot be deemed to have legally assumed the risk of an injury which proximately resulted from such a condition ( see, Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432).

O'Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

In Clark v. State of New York, 245 A.D.2d 413, 666 N.Y.S.2d 209, this Court stated that "[t]he claimant's decedent... was injured while playing basketball in a State park in Yorktown, New York. The trial court correctly concluded that the claimant's decedent did not assume the risk of an injury caused by a steep drop-off several inches from the edge of the playing area's asphalt surface since this created a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport" (id. at 413, 666 N.Y.S.2d 209 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary of this case from Philius v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL S. CLARK, as Administrator of the Estate of LIONEL CLARK, II…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

Philius v. City of N.Y.

In Cronson v. Town of N. Hempstead , 245 A.D.2d 331, 665 N.Y.S.2d 98, this Court noted that the plaintiff…

Simmons v. Sauger-Ties Cen. School Dist

We agree with Supreme Court that a hole of this size is "not automatically an inherent risk of a sport as a…