concluding that it did not matter whether the defendants complied with the standards established by local ordinances in operating their nuisance-causing furnace because "it is well-settled that a private nuisance often flows from the consequences of an otherwise lawful act"
Summary of this case from Tiongco v. Sw. Energy Prod. Co.1085 MDA 2015
05-06-2016
Clark, S. & V. v. Fritz, M. & S., and Fritz, H.
Affirmed
concluding that it did not matter whether the defendants complied with the standards established by local ordinances in operating their nuisance-causing furnace because "it is well-settled that a private nuisance often flows from the consequences of an otherwise lawful act"
Summary of this case from Tiongco v. Sw. Energy Prod. Co.Full title:Clark, S. & V. v. Fritz, M. & S., and Fritz, H.
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: May 6, 2016
As such, "lawful activities may be enjoined where they unreasonably interfere with another's property…
Gerhart v. Energy Transfer PartnersTo collect damages, a plaintiff must prove that the nuisance caused "significant harm." See, e.g., Clark v.…