Clark v. Marshall

Full title: CHESTER LEDZEPPLIN CLARK, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

CV 04-481-DDP (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2009)

Opinion

CHESTER LEDZEPPLIN CLARK, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, WARDEN, Respondent. No. CV 04-481-DDP (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 8, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objection. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which objections have been stated in writing. Having completed its review, the Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.