From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Judge

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 1965
44 N.J. 550 (N.J. 1965)

Opinion

Argued May 3 and 4, 1965 —

Decided May 24, 1965.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant Annette M. Judge ( Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper Vanderbilt, attorneys; Mr. Roger M. Nelson, of counsel).

Mr. James C. McKay of the District of Columbia Bar argued the cause for appellant Elizabeth M. Judge ( Messrs. Kaufman, Kaufman Kaufman, attorneys; Mr. Andrew L. Kaufman, Mr. Frederick L. Kirgis, Jr. and Messrs. Covington Burling of the District of Columbia Bar, of counsel).

Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent ( Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer Brown, attorneys; Mr. Morton R. Covitz, Mr. Eli Whitney Debevoise of the New York Bar and Mr. Earle J. Starkey of the New York Bar, of counsel).

Mr. Bernard M. Shanley argued the cause for defendants-respondents ( Mr. F. Earl Walter, Jr. on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Pashman in the Superior Court.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Clark v. Judge

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 1965
44 N.J. 550 (N.J. 1965)
Case details for

Clark v. Judge

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH WYMOND CLARK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 24, 1965

Citations

44 N.J. 550 (N.J. 1965)
210 A.2d 415

Citing Cases

Zippertubing Co. v. Teleflex Inc.

The constructive trust is, of course a familiar remedy in the New Jersey courts. Clark v. Judge, 84 N.J.…

Wolosoff v. CSI Liquidating Trust

To the same effect was Application of Slocum, 274 A.D. 244, 80 N.Y.S.2d 801 (App.Div. 1948); In re Malone's…