From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Duck Key Marina, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 19, 1992
602 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2210.

July 15, 1992. Rehearing Denied August 19, 1992.

Appeal from the Judge of Compensation Claims John G. Tomlinson, Jr.

Gloria Pomerantz, and Diane H. Tutt, of Diane H. Tutt, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert H. Krebs of Miller, Kagan Chait, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellees.


The claimant appeals a workers' compensation order by which a claim for various benefits was denied. Among other contentions, the claimant asserts that he should be excused from a job search obligation under the authority of cases such as Michael v. National Industries, Inc., 599 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In Michael the record established without controversion that the employer/carrier had failed to provide the claimant with job search information. There is no such evidence in the present case, and the employer/carrier's failure to provide job search information may not be presumed from a silent record. If a claimant seeks to be relieved of a job search obligation when it would otherwise be a necessary aspect of the claimant's burden of proof, the claimant must insure that the record affirmatively reflects the necessary predicate for such relief.

The appealed order is affirmed.

SHIVERS and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. Duck Key Marina, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 19, 1992
602 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Clark v. Duck Key Marina, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR CLARK, APPELLANT, v. DUCK KEY MARINA, INC. AND FEISCO, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 19, 1992

Citations

602 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz

The record contains no proof of the extent of Claimant's knowledge of the statutory work-search requirements.…