From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Salem v. Kimball

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1971
482 P.2d 191 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Argued March 16, 1971

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction March 16, 1971

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

GEORGE JONES, Judge.

Mike Dye, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Kleen Dye, Salem.

William G. Blair, Assistant City Attorney, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William J. Juza, City Attorney, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FORT, Judges.


DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

This appeal involved violation of a city ordinance. Oral argument confirmed the fact that the appeal did not involve an issue as to "* * * the constitutionality of the charter provision or ordinance under which the conviction was obtained * * *." ORS 221.360. Therefore, in view of ORS 221.350 and 221.360, we ruled from the bench that this case be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

This matter could have been more expeditiously and less expensively handled by a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction prior to the filing of briefs.


Summaries of

City of Salem v. Kimball

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1971
482 P.2d 191 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

City of Salem v. Kimball

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF SALEM, Respondent, v. ARLO WILLIAM KIMBALL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1971

Citations

482 P.2d 191 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
482 P.2d 191

Citing Cases

Whittaker v. Salem

In the performance of their functions they have a wide discretion, and to a large degree they are unhampered…

Tillamook City v. Bogart

Appeal dismissed on court's own motion for want of jurisdiction since no constitutional issue is presented in…