From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Poughkeepsie v. Nutra-Vet Research

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal and the cross appeal from the order are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is modified by deleting therefrom the term "$19,750" and substituting therefor the term "$17,750", as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings consistent herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that the City of Poughkeepsie is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal and cross appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal and cross appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The Supreme Court properly determined that the penalty contained in paragraph 12 of the stipulation of settlement was not unenforceable as violative of public policy, as the penalty imposed is the same penalty authorized by the City of Poughkeepsie Zoning and Land Use Code for failure to cure a violation of that ordinance (City of Poughkeepsie Zoning and Land Use Code § 19-7.8 [1]; see, Truck Rent-A-Center v Puritan Farms 2nd, 41 N.Y.2d 420, 424; City of Rye v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 34 N.Y.2d 470, 472-473). Moreover, by the express terms of paragraph 12 of the stipulation, a weekly penalty of $250 was mandated upon the failure of Nutra-Vet Research Corporation to remove its trailers by the date specified in the stipulation.

However, given that there is a factual dispute as to whether the trailers were removed in July 1988 as alleged by Nutra-Vet Research Corporation, or in September 1988 as is urged by the City of Poughkeepsie, the court erred in concluding, without a hearing, that Nutra-Vet Research Corporation violated the stipulation of settlement through August 31, 1988. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for a hearing to determine when the trailers were removed, and for a recalculation of the fines, if any, to be imposed in addition to the $17,500 for the period from July 1988 through September 1988.

The City of Poughkeepsie's contention that the Supreme Court erred in not awarding it additional penalties is without merit. Brown, J.P., Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Poughkeepsie v. Nutra-Vet Research

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

City of Poughkeepsie v. Nutra-Vet Research

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE, Respondent-Appellant, v. NUTRA-VET RESEARCH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev. of City of New York v. 992 Jefferson Ave.

Med Or., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853 [1985] [failure to make prima facie showing of entitlement to summary j udgment…

Suffolk Real Estate Sols. v. Marquez

In light of the conflicting allegations between the affirmation of noncompliance and occupant's affidavit…