From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Los Angeles v. Nash

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 18, 1931
114 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 7336.

May 18, 1931.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying motion to tax costs. Douglas L. Edmonds, Judge. Affirmed.

Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Arthur Loveland and Arthur W. Nordstrom, Deputies City Attorney, for Appellant.

Meserve Meserve for Respondents.


[1] This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs, in which all the material facts and questions of law are identical with those of City of Los Angeles v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, Julia Fanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [ 299 P. 807], this day decided. The same disposition should be made of the instant case.

Order affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.


Summaries of

City of Los Angeles v. Nash

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 18, 1931
114 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

City of Los Angeles v. Nash

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. HARRY B. NASH…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: May 18, 1931

Citations

114 Cal.App. 758 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
299 P. 813