Summary
In City of Los Angeles v. Bank of America Corp., 2015 WL 4880511 (C.D. Cal. May 11, 2015), the district court dismissed an FHA discriminatory lending suit for lack of standing where the municipal plaintiff's standing theory turned on its desire to "ensur[e] that [its] residents are free from housing discrimination."
Summary of this case from Cnty. of Cook v. Wells Fargo & Co.Opinion
CV 13-9046 PA (AGRx)
05-11-2015
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS; and COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court's May 11, 2015 Minute Order granting the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. (for itself and as successor-by-merger to Countrywide Bank, FSB), Countrywide Financial Corporation, and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), which granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims asserted by plaintiff City of Los Angeles ("Plaintiff"),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiffs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 11, 2015
/s/_________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE