From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Jacksonville v. Mack

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 18, 1972
260 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. P-363.

April 18, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, John M. McNatt, J.

James C. Rinaman, Jr., David U. Tumin, and William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Greene, Greene, Smith Davenport, Jacksonville, for appellees.


The appellant City of Jacksonville appeals from a final judgment in favor of appellees. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that appellees were joint tortfeasors with another and that the prior release of the other also released and discharged appellees.

The findings of fact made by a court sitting as a trier of the facts are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury and such findings will not be disturbed unless there is a total lack of substantial testimony and evidence to support the conclusion reached. This Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. These principles have been reaffirmed so many times by the appellate courts of this State that no purpose would be served by reiterating the many citations which do so.

Our examination of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments of the parties leads us to conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the judgment appealed herein, and the same is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C.J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Jacksonville v. Mack

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 18, 1972
260 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

City of Jacksonville v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. ULY P. MACK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 18, 1972

Citations

260 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin

First, it is not the function of an appellate court to reevaluate the evidence and substitute its judgment…

Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.

First, it is not the function of an appellate court to reevaluate the evidence and substitute its judgment…