From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Dayton v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jun 22, 2022
167 Ohio St. 3d 565 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

No. 2021-0592

06-22-2022

The City of DAYTON, Appellee, v. The STATE of Ohio, Appellant.

Barbara J. Doseck, Dayton City Attorney, and John C. Musto, Dayton Chief Trial Counsel, for appellee. Dave Yost, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor General, and Caitlyn Nestleroth Johnson and Iris Jin, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.


Barbara J. Doseck, Dayton City Attorney, and John C. Musto, Dayton Chief Trial Counsel, for appellee.

Dave Yost, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor General, and Caitlyn Nestleroth Johnson and Iris Jin, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for application of Newburgh Hts. v. State , ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2022-Ohio-1642, ––– N.E.3d ––––.

Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur.

O'Connor, C.J., would reverse the court of appeals’ judgment only as to the home-rule issues.


Summaries of

City of Dayton v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jun 22, 2022
167 Ohio St. 3d 565 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

City of Dayton v. State

Case Details

Full title:The City of DAYTON, Appellee, v. The STATE of Ohio, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

167 Ohio St. 3d 565 (Ohio 2022)
195 N.E.3d 130

Citing Cases

City of Dayton v. State

Accordingly, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment in Dayton I in its entirety and remanded the case to this…

City of Dayton v. Siff

However, in June 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio vacated our judgment and remanded the case for consideration…