From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Dayton v. Bonding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 7, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-324 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-324

10-07-2014

CITY OF DAYTON, Plaintiff, v. CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO LIABILITY (Doc. 39)

This civil action is before the Court on Third-Party Plaintiff Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company's ("CBIC") Motion for Default Judgment as to Liability against Third-Party Defendant Larry R. Hamilton d/b/a Up Front Logistics ("Hamilton"). (Doc. 39). Hamilton did not respond.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CBIC filed its third-party complaint on March 17, 2014. (Doc. 11). Hamilton wa served on July 25, 2014, but failed to answer on or before August 15, 2014. (Doc. 27; notation Order of August 5, 2014). Therefore, Hamilton is in default. On August 28, 2014, the clerk entered default. (Doc. 36). Subsequently, CBIC filed the instant motion for default judgment. (Doc. 39).

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW

Applications for default judgment are governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). "Following the clerk's entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and the party's application for default under Rule 55(b), 'the complaint's factual allegations regarding liability are taken as true, while allegations regarding the amount of damages must be proven.'" Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Pub Dayton, LLC, No. 3:11-cv-58, 2011 WL 2118228, *2 (S.D. Ohio May 27, 2011) (quoting Morisaki v. Davenport, Allen & Malone, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-298, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86241, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2010)).

While liability may be shown by well-pleaded allegations, this Court is required to "conduct an inquiry in order to ascertain the amount of damages with reasonable certainty." Osbeck v. Golfside Auto Sales, Inc., No. 07-14004, No. 07-14004, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62027, at *5 (E.D. Mich. June. 23, 2010). To do so, the civil rules "require that the party moving for a default judgment must present some evidence of its damages." Mill's Pride, L.P. v. W.D. Miller Enterpr., No. 2:07cv990, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36756, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2010).

III. ANALYSIS

"Where damages are unliquidated a default admits only defendant's liability and the amount of damages must be proved." Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., 66 F.3d 105, 110 (6th Cir. 1995) (quoting Fehlhaber v. Fehlhaber, 681 F.2d 1015, 1026 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc)). CBIC's third-party complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and contribution/indemnification against Hamilton and seeks to hold him liable for any judgment against CBIC on Plaintiff's claims. Doc. 11). "[A] third-party complaint must be founded on a third party's actual or potential liability to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the defendant." Am. Zurich Ins. Co. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 512 F.3d 800, 805 (6th Cir. 2008).

Here, based on Hamilton's default, the Court concludes that Hamilton has breached the terms of the Subcontract Agreement, and Hamilton is required to indemnify CBIC for any claims or damages resulting from his negligent acts or omissions in performing the Subcontract Agreement. Accordingly, Hamilton is liable to CBIC for any damages Plaintiff obtains on its claims against CBIC. The amount of CBIC's damages, if any, will be determined only upon resolution of Plaintiff's claims against CBIC.

Accordingly, CBIC's Motion for Default Judgment as to Liability (Doc. 39) is GRANTED on all of CBIC's third-party claims asserted against Hamilton. CBIC is GRANTED LEAVE to file a supplemental motion for final judgment and an award of damages by the dispositive motion deadline of January 9, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/7/14

s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

City of Dayton v. Bonding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 7, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-324 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2014)
Case details for

City of Dayton v. Bonding

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF DAYTON, Plaintiff, v. CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-324 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Stone v. Erhart

Even assuming that liability can be established on the present record, Plaintiff must introduce evidence…