From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 2, 1969
253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1969 —

Decided June 2, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 104 N.J. Super. 45.

Mr. Prospero DeBona argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Milton, Keane DeBona, attorneys; Mr. John B. Wefing on the brief).

Mr. Nicholas A. Panepinto argued the cause for the respondent, City of Bayonne.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief for the respondent, Division of Tax Appeals ( Mr. Charles H. Landesman, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 104 N.J. Super. 45.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 2, 1969
253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BAYONNE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. INTERNATIONAL NICKEL CO., INC…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 2, 1969

Citations

253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)
253 A.2d 545

Citing Cases

Seegmiller v. County of Nevada

This was made clear in City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co. (1968) 104 N.J. Super. 45 [ 248 A.2d 547]…

Mayor, Bd. Aldermen of Dover v. Texlite, Inc.

[Emphasis added] Thus, any business machinery or equipment of Briggs located in Dover at any time during the…