From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Batavia v. Bolas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 7, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, Graney, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly determined that the measure of damages in this partial taking case was "the difference between the value of the whole before the taking and the value of the remainder after the taking" (Diocese of Buffalo v State of New York, 24 N.Y.2d 320, 323). We affirm the trial court's award inasmuch as it is within the range of the conflicting expert opinion testimony and is not affected by legal error (see, Matter of Village of Hilton v Edelman, 83 A.D.2d 767; City of Buffalo v Goldman, 63 A.D.2d 828, 829). The city's appraisal complied with the requirements established by the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 N.Y.CRR part 202) and was not based upon the method of valuation held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals in Latham Holding Co. v State of New York ( 16 N.Y.2d 41).


Summaries of

City of Batavia v. Bolas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

City of Batavia v. Bolas

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BATAVIA, Respondent, v. LEO J. BOLAS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 154

Citing Cases

Meyers v. State

The claimants also failed to prove that they are entitled to compensation for noise and increased traffic…

Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. Reith

Ordered that the judgment and the order and judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs. The award of…