From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens Bank v. C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2004
5 A.D.3d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-01196.

Decided March 15, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp., Leonard Peter Smith, and Pearl Smith appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated November 19, 2002, which denied their motions, among other things, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated July 13, 1994, and to cancel a referee's deed issued on July 12, 1995, and strike it from the public record.

Martin H. Bernsley, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Sanders, Gutman Brodie, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Robert Gutman and D. Michael Roberts of counsel), for nonparty-respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P. SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellants' motions, inter alia, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to cancel the referee's deed were barred by the doctrine of res judicata because the claims contained therein could have or should have been raised on the defendants' first motion, brought in 1995, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale ( see O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357; Coliseum Towers Assocs. v. County of Nassau, 217 A.D.2d 387).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citizens Bank v. C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2004
5 A.D.3d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Citizens Bank v. C.L.R. Brooklyn Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS BANK OF APPLETON CITY, MISSOURI, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Sterngass v. Soffer

Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties, or…

Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc. v. Hamilton

Plaintiff fails to refute defendants claims regarding Rosen's actions. Instead, plaintiff contends that…