Opinion
No. 10975/09.
2015-03-12
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Plaintiff, v. Gloriane M. IMPROTA, Defendant.
Forster & Garbus, Commack, NY, for Plaintiff. Leavitt, Kerson & Duane, Flushing, NY, for Defendant.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. Improta
Civil Court, City of New York, Richmond County.
Mar 12, 2015
47 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2015)
Summaries of
Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. Improta
Civil Court, City of New York, Richmond County.
Mar 12, 2015
47 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2015)
Case details for
Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. Improta
Case Details
Full title:CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Plaintiff, v. Gloriane M. IMPROTA, Defendant.
Court:Civil Court, City of New York, Richmond County.
Date published: Mar 12, 2015
Citations
47 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 50361
15 N.Y.S.3d 711
Citing Cases
76-82 St. Marks, LLC v. Gluck
The plaintiff's principal was not present when the original guaranty was executed, and thus could not testify…