From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank v. Kallman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9272 Index 810107/10

05-09-2019

CITIBANK, N.A., etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Marc Scott KALLMAN, Defendant–Appellant, Board of Managers of 52 East End Avenue Condominium Homeowners Association, et al., Defendants.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, for appellant. Houser & Allison, APC, New York (Kathleen M. Massimo of counsel), for respondent.


Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Houser & Allison, APC, New York (Kathleen M. Massimo of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

Appeal from order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered September 27, 2017, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment, nunc pro tunc, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The original judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered upon defendant's default (the court struck his answer) which he never remedied. No appeal lies from an order or judgment entered on default ( CPLR 5511 ).


Summaries of

Citibank v. Kallman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Citibank v. Kallman

Case Details

Full title:Citibank, N.A., etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marc Scott Kallman…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 9, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3679
97 N.Y.S.3d 863

Citing Cases

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Scaffidi

The order that granted summary judgment to plaintiff against defendant Carmelo Scaffidi, upon reargument, was…

4042 E. Tremont Cafe´ Corp. v. Sodono

Tosca Coal's appeal from the April 2018 order is dismissed because Tosca Coal defaulted in Supreme Court…