From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cipollo v. Colusa County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1673 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1673 MCE CKD PS

09-28-2015

DIANNE CIPOLLO, Plaintiff, v. COLUSA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 20, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: September 28, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4 cipollo1673.fta


Summaries of

Cipollo v. Colusa County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1673 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Cipollo v. Colusa County

Case Details

Full title:DIANNE CIPOLLO, Plaintiff, v. COLUSA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1673 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2015)