From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cioffi v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 6, 2001.

June 25, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Blair Kennedy appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated November 21, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Longo D'Apice, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Michelle Incandela and Mark A. Longo of counsel), for appellant.

Frank J. Laine, Mineola, N.Y. (Frank Braunstein of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the respondent was not required to meet the standards applicable to a party seeking to restore an action to the trial calendar after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. Since there is no evidence that a note of issue placing the action on the trial calendar was filed (see, CPLR 3402), the action could not be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see, Georgetown Mews Owners Corp. v. Campus Assocs., A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 29, 2001]; Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 14, 2001; P. Cubed Enters. v. Roach, 265 A.D.2d 537; Davila v. Galarza, 221 A.D.2d 308). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to restore the action.

SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO, FEUERSTEIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cioffi v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Cioffi v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CIOFFI, respondent, v. BLAIR KENNEDY, appellant, ET AL., defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 581

Citing Cases

Ranger Insurance v. Smith

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Contrary to the defendants'…

Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.

Since it is now well settled that CPLR 3404 may not be applied to pre-note of issue cases (see Wasilewicz v.…