From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yuen v. Kwan Kam Cheng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2010
69 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

January 28, 2010.

Appeal from order Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered May 16, 2008, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on her claim for breach of contract, deemed an appeal from judgment (CPLR 5501 [c]), same court and Judicial Hearing Officer, entered July 3, 2008, awarding plaintiff the total amount of $133,164.53, and, so considered, said judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.


Defendants' argument on appeal that the judicial hearing officer lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion for summary judgment has been waived by their complete and active participation in the hearing and resolution of the motion without objection ( see e.g. Morton v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp., 308 AD2d 566).

On the merits, the motion court correctly determined that plaintiff was entitled to the refund of her down payment. The contract contained no time limit within which plaintiff had to cancel the purchase agreement, and therefore a reasonable time for cancellation thereunder is implied ( see e.g. Combs v Lewis, 1 AD3d 236, lv denied 3 NY3d 610). Plaintiffs notice of cancellation, based on the bank's denial of the mortgage application, was reasonable. Additionally, any breaches of the contract by plaintiff were unrelated to the reasons for the denial of the mortgage application ( see e.g. Gorgoglione v Gillenson, 47 AD3d 472).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Yuen v. Kwan Kam Cheng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2010
69 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Yuen v. Kwan Kam Cheng

Case Details

Full title:CINDY YUEN, Respondent, v. KWAN KAM CHENG et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2010

Citations

69 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
895 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

Makris v. Boylan

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the evidence conclusively established that the purchase agreement was…

Larussa v. Williams

While the record before us does not include an order of reference designating the JHO ( seeCPLR 4311,…