From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 12, 2006
842 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

2005-1930.

January 12, 2006.


MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

On December 30, 2005, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply brief to relator's answer brief. Whereas there are no provisions in Gov.Bar R. VII for filing a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply brief is denied.


Summaries of

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 12, 2006
842 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

842 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio 2006)
108 Ohio St. 3d 1402
2006 Ohio 82

Citing Cases

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey

Respondent also filed a motion for an order declaring Gov.Bar R. VII unconstitutional on its face and as…