From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cifuentes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1998
717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-837.

Opinion filed September 9, 1998. JULY TERM, A.D. 1998.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, L.T. Nos. 96-11162, 96-17102. Paul Siegel, Judge.

John H. Lipinski, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Christine E. Zahralban, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the revocation of defendant's probation and the sentence imposed. See Inman v. State, 684 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order specifically listing the conditions of probation defendant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Palacios v. State, 706 So.2d 1382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.


Summaries of

Cifuentes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1998
717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Cifuentes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jose CIFUENTES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 9, 1998

Citations

717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Shuler v. State

We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order listing the grounds for the violation. See Bell…

Rodriguez v. State

We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements.…