From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ciccone v. Ciccone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 14, 1987
509 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-549.

July 14, 1987.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Michael H. Salmon, Judge.

Lazan, Trute, Moss, Robbins and Howard and Melvyn Trute and David M. Lazan, Surfside, for appellant.

John F. Cosgrove, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the Order Regarding Temporary Relief from which this appeal is taken. However, our affirmance of such order recognizes its temporary nature and is not to be taken as an indication that the relief granted therein to the appellant-wife would be appropriate on a final disposition of this matter. We remind the trial court that, at the final hearing, which, we hope, will occur without undue delay, the husband's assets as well as income are to be taken into account in fixing his obligations to pay alimony and child support. See Wright v. Wright, 507 So.2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ciccone v. Ciccone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 14, 1987
509 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Ciccone v. Ciccone

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MAUREEN CICCONE, APPELLANT, v. SALVATORE CICCONE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 14, 1987

Citations

509 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Koris v. Koris

AFFIRMED. See, e.g., Ciccone v. Ciccone, 509 So.2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Wolfson v. Wolfson, 455 So.2d 577…