From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Churchfield v. Hoffmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1954
284 App. Div. 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

November 18, 1954.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Franklin County.


Upon the argument of this appeal counsel conceded that paragraph numbered 6 of the demand should be stricken out. Other paragraphs of the demand require the plaintiffs to furnish certified copies of maps, names of certain persons whose only connection with the action appears to be as prospective witnesses and, in effect, title searches. Such items are not properly obtainable by means of a bill of particulars. Order modified by striking from the demand the paragraphs numbered 3 and 6, the words "and present addresses" in paragraph numbered 2 and the portion of paragraph numbered 2 beginning with the words "and a further statement", the portion of paragraph numbered 4 beginning with the words "and the names of the employees" and the portion of paragraph numbered 9 beginning with the words "a further statement" and as modified affirmed, without costs. Bergan, J.P., Coon, Halpern, Imrie and Zeller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Churchfield v. Hoffmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1954
284 App. Div. 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Churchfield v. Hoffmann

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS P. CHURCHFIELD et al., Appellants, v. KURT E. HOFFMANN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Goldsmith v. Goldsmith

The Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the judgment and order on the opinion rendered in Moses v. Hatch (…