Opinion
Nos. 85053, 85117.
April 11, 1996.
Two Cases Consolidated: Applications for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Third District — Nos. 93-2606 and 93-2613, Dade County.
Esther E. Galicia of George, Hartz, Lundeen, Flagg, Fulmer, Fort Lauderdale, for Dina R. Chung, M.D., and Dina R. Chung, M.D., P.A.
Steven E. Stark of Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick Strickroot, P.A., Miami for University of Miami, Anthony Lai, M.D. and Thomas A. Quetel, M.D.
Stanley M. Rosenblatt, Susan Rosenblatt and David C. Rash of Stanley M. Rosenblatt, P.A., Miami, for Malka Fink, et al.
Stuart H. Sobel of Sobel Sobel, P.A., Miami, for Lawrence Forman.
Roy D. Wasson, Miami, for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae.
We have for review Forman v. Fink, 646 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), which concerns the appropriate scope of discovery necessary to impeach the testimony of an opponent's expert medical witness. We addressed this same issue in Elkins v. Syken, 672 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1996). In accordance with our decision in Elkins, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.