From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christopher v. Blooming

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 2007
37 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 8024/87.

February 27, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about November 3, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs' motion for a protective order and directed them to undergo forensic psychiatric examinations by defendants' expert, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Ian Anderson, New York, for appellants.

Herzfeld Rubin, P.C., New York (Neil R. Finkston of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.


Plaintiffs, who alleged that they suffered from "multiple chemical sensitivities," placed their mental conditions in controversy (CPLR 3121 [a]) by asserting in their bills of particulars that they suffered from such mental disturbances as "severe anxiety" and "acute fear of the carc[i]nogenic nature and permanent effects of the chemicals in question" ( see Syron v Paolelli, 238 AD2d 710; St. Clare v Cattani, 128 AD2d 766), and by submitting to an examination by a psychologist to whom their treating physician had referred them ( see TOA Constr. Co. v Tsitsires, 4 AD3d 141, 142 [2004]).


Summaries of

Christopher v. Blooming

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 2007
37 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Christopher v. Blooming

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SPIERER et al., Appellants, v. BLOOMINGDALE'S, a Division of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1618
830 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

Clark v. Allen & Overy, LLP

Although plaintiff denies that defendant's actions caused any diagnosed psychiatric condition and does not…