Opinion
June 22, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about August 18, 1999, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff Nadira Choudhury had not sustained "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Christopher W. Ambler, for plaintiff-respondent.
David Pomerantz, for defendants-appellants.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.
The unsworn medical report prepared by defendants' medical expert and submitted in support of their summary judgment motion was insufficient to satisfy defendants' initial burden as summary judgment movants to make a prima facie showing that plaintiff had not sustained "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see, DeAngelo v. Fidel Corp. Servs., Inc., 171 A.D.2d 588, 589). In any event, defendants' claim that the diagnoses of plaintiff Nadira Choudhury's examining physician are without probative value because they are not supported by objective tests is unavailing because his findings were based on his own physical examination of plaintiff (see, Grossman v. Wright, 268 A.D.2d 79, 2000 N Y App. Div. LEXIS 5129). Defendants' remaining contentions raise issues of credibility appropriately left for resolution at trial (see, Vargas v. New York City Tr. Auth., 254 A.D.2d 175, 176).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.