From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chopak v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1964
22 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

November 30, 1964


In an action to recover money loaned and interest, in which the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant Joseph Marcus in the Civil Court of the City of New York, and thereafter, as judgment creditor, issued and served a purported subpoena upon Hayes Development, Inc., calling for its examination as a third party with respect to any property of the judgment debtor in its possession (cf. CPLR 5223, 5224), the plaintiff, pursuant to leave granted by this court, appeals from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, dated April 27, 1964, which affirmed an order of the said Civil Court, entered November 1, 1963, denying his motion to punish Hayes Development, Inc., for contempt by reason of its failure to obey said subpoena. Order of the Appellate Term affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The plaintiff, who is not an attorney and who appeared in propria persona, is not a person authorized to issue a subpoena without a court order (CPLR 2302, subd. [a]; cf. Schwartz v. Shapiro, 91 N.Y.S.2d 771). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chopak v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1964
22 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Chopak v. Marcus

Case Details

Full title:JULES CHOPAK, Appellant, v. JOSEPH MARCUS, Defendant. HAYES DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Price v. State

By these related motions, claimant is attempting to get permission to conduct examinations before trial of…