From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chitayat v. Princeton Restoration Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5608N

December 13, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered May 4, 2001, which granted defendant Town of Huntington's motion for a change of venue to Suffolk County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michael Cook, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Wade T. Dempsey Jillian A. Guthman, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Wallach, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


In this action involving an accident that took place in the Town of Huntington in Suffolk County, plaintiffs, residents of New York County, failed to overcome the statutory presumption that an action against a town "shall" be in the county in which the town is situated (CPLR 504) by carrying their burden of demonstrating "compelling countervailing circumstances" (Ruiz v. City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 327). Plaintiffs failed to name any witnesses in New York County who might be inconvenienced or describe their anticipated testimony (see, Emerick v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 272 A.D.2d 150); failed to substantiate their claim that the many doctor appointments necessary to treat the injured plaintiff's serious medical condition precludes her from going to Suffolk County; and left unchallenged the assertion, based on testimony at plaintiffs' General Municipal Law § 50-e hearing, that the injured plaintiff had returned to her job in neighboring Nassau County and that plaintiffs drive there together.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Chitayat v. Princeton Restoration Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Chitayat v. Princeton Restoration Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DEANNA CHITAYAT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PRINCETON RESTORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

N. C. v. Ifezulumbria

. Although venue may be placed in a county other than the county mandated by CPLR 504 upon a showing of…

Alvarez v. Metropolitan Transp. Co.

Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Catterson, Richter, Román, JJ. CPLR 504(1) would ordinarily place venue in Westchester…