Summary
holding that the transcript "revealed no attempt by the district court to influence the jury's perception of the probative value of Etim's evidence" where the district court commented on the inadmissibility of his exhibits, including "admonishing the jury not to consider hearsay allegations that Etim made in a letter."
Summary of this case from Graduation Sols. v. Acadima, LLCOpinion
97-7828.
July 28, 1998.
Appeal from S.D.N.Y., 966 F.Supp. 218.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.