From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chirino v. Proud 2 Haul, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Apr 25, 2019
237 N.J. 440 (N.J. 2019)

Opinion

A-15 September Term 2018 080747

04-25-2019

Gonzalo CHIRINO, Felix D. Jay, Andrew Ankle, Gary Josephs, Rene Campbell, Aston Hemley and Maryan Vasyuta, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PROUD 2 HAUL, INC., and Ivana Koprowski, Defendants-Appellants.

Robert J. De Groot, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Robert J. De Groot and Garrubo & Capece, attorneys; Robert J. De Groot, of counsel and on the brief, Frank Capece, of counsel, and Oleg Nekritin, East Hanover, on the brief). David Tykulsker, Montclair, argued the cause for respondents (David Tykulsker & Associates, attorneys; David Tykulsker, of counsel and on the brief).


Robert J. De Groot, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Robert J. De Groot and Garrubo & Capece, attorneys; Robert J. De Groot, of counsel and on the brief, Frank Capece, of counsel, and Oleg Nekritin, East Hanover, on the brief).

David Tykulsker, Montclair, argued the cause for respondents (David Tykulsker & Associates, attorneys; David Tykulsker, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAMThe judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Alvarez's opinion, reported at 458 N.J. Super. 308, 205 A.3d 225, 2017 WL 5898797 (App. Div. 2017).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.


Summaries of

Chirino v. Proud 2 Haul, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Apr 25, 2019
237 N.J. 440 (N.J. 2019)
Case details for

Chirino v. Proud 2 Haul, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Gonzalo Chirino, Felix D. Jay, Andrew Ankle, Gary Josephs, Rene Campbell…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Apr 25, 2019

Citations

237 N.J. 440 (N.J. 2019)
206 A.3d 351

Citing Cases

Saadeh v. Majestic Towing & Transp.

Under these circumstances, we are satisfied that "'it would be unfair, and contrary to our established…

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.L. (In re Au.L.)

The Supreme Court regularly decides appeals by adoption of either a majority or dissenting opinion. See,…