From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chinnis v. Chinnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1986
119 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Bradley, J.).


Plaintiff commenced the instant divorce action against defendant alleging cruel and inhuman treatment. Among the acts of such treatment alleged to have been committed by defendant were verbal abuse, religious harassment and refusal to engage in marital relations. After answering, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Special Term denied that motion, and this appeal was taken.

While it is true that mere marital disharmony and incompatibility are insufficient to establish grounds for divorce, the alleged acts of defendant constitute a course of conduct, which, if proven at trial, could conceivably be determined to endanger plaintiff's mental well-being so as to make the parties' continued cohabitation unsafe or improper (see, Domestic Relations Law § 170; Pfeil v. Pfeil, 100 A.D.2d 725; Lerner v. Lerner, 65 A.D.2d 889). Accordingly, Special Term did not err in declining to dismiss the complaint at this early stage.

Order affirmed, without costs. Main, J.P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chinnis v. Chinnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1986
119 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Chinnis v. Chinnis

Case Details

Full title:HOBSON D. CHINNIS, Respondent, v. ROSALIE CHINNIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Ross

Contrary to the husband's present contentions, we discern no error in the court's determination that the…

Preston v. Preston

Therefore, plaintiff's contentions, if true, are legally sufficient to support a divorce upon the grounds of…