Opinion
Argued March 7, 1892
Decided March 25, 1892
Alexander Blumensteil for appellants.
James Byrne for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Childs v. Latham
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1892
131 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Childs v. Latham
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1892
131 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Childs v. Latham
Case Details
Full title:DANIEL B. CHILDS, Receiver, etc., Respondent, v . EDWARD T. LATHAM et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 25, 1892
Citations
131 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1892)
43 N.Y. St. Rptr. 963
Citing Cases
Matter of Pond
Benson v. Berry, 55 Barb. 620; Benjamin v. Smith, 12 Wend. 404. And in order to entitle a party holding a…