From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiccino v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 12, 1982
87 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

April 12, 1982

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wayne County, De Pasquale, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff has no cause of action against her parents, the defendants herein, for negligent supervision (see Holodook v Spencer, 36 N.Y.2d 35) or for negligent entrustment of a dangerous instrumentality (see Nolechek v Gesuale, 46 N.Y.2d 332).


Summaries of

Chiccino v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 12, 1982
87 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Chiccino v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:LORI CHICCINO, Respondent, v. DORIS HARTMAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Cnty. of Tompkins

Most cases of negligent entrustment involve an adult entrusting a dangerous instrumentality to a minor. see…